Justice in the Kakatiya Era: Resolving the Chamanapalli Canal Dispute (1246 CE)
I. The Conflict: Water Rights
In medieval Telangana, irrigation was the lifeblood of the village economy. This record details a significant dispute over the Gonugu-kaluva (canal) in the village of Chamanapalli. When local tensions could not be eased, the state intervened using a structured judicial process.
II. The Five-Step Judicial Process
1. Appointment:
King Ganapatideva dispatched Minister Mamchi-raja as a royal commissioner to lead the inquiry.
2. Field Investigation:
Rather than a closed-door hearing, the assembly met near the canal. Mamchi-raja summoned neutral elders from Kummarikunta, Devanapalli, and Katyakolapalli to provide evidence based on "old arrangements."
3. Royal Review:
The findings were not settled locally. Mamchi-raja traveled to the capital, Orungallu (Warangal), with local representatives to submit a formal report to the King.
4. Imperial Decree:
The King and Maharaja Akayachandradeva issued a final order. This was carried back by officers Narayana and Maharaka, who were received with high ritual respect by the local administration.
5. Restitution:
Following a final re-examination and confirmation of evidence from the Brahmanas of Chamanapalli, the rights to the canal were formally restored.
III. Key Personnel & Witnesses
The record preserves the names of those who maintained the legal order of the district:
Local Officers:
Ravidatta Vaghadeva Hingadeva
Community Witnesses:
Damaya Appaya Pochiraja Vollamaraja Karapaka Rudra
Historical Insight: This inscription proves that Kakatiya law was not merely top-down. It relied on community consensus, neutral third-party testimony, and a clear "chain of custody" for evidence from the village to the royal capital at Orungallu.
Comments
Post a Comment